An immigration judge ruled Friday that Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil can be deported on grounds that he threatens foreign policy, as alleged by the Trump administration.
The stunning move may have repercussions on hundreds of other international students who have been targeted by the administration.
The Louisiana judge has given Khalil’s lawyers a deadline of April 23 to file applications for relief to stop his deportation. The judge said if they failed to make the deadline, she would file an order of removal to either Syria or Algeria.
Mahmoud Khalil speaks to members of media about the Revolt for Rafah encampment at Columbia University during the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas in Gaza, in New York, June 1, 2024.
Jeenah Moon/Reuters, FILE
The ruling stunned supporters in the court as the judge issued it. Some supporters in the courthouse began to weep as she agreed with the government’s assertion that they did not have to provide any evidence in addition for the administration’s main claim against Khalil.
Khalil, a green card holder and permanent legal resident who is married to an American citizen, addressed the court after the hearing was adjourned and spoke to the judge directly, referring to a previous comment she had made about due process and “fundamental fairness.”
“I would like to quote what you said last time, that there’s nothing that’s more important to this court than due process rights and fundamental fairness. Clearly what we witnessed today, neither of these principles were present today or in this whole process. This is exactly why the Trump administration has sent me to this court, 1,000 miles away from my family. I just hope that the urgency that you deemed fit for me are afforded to the hundreds of others who have been here without hearing for months,” he said.
Judge Jamee Comans’ decision to remove Khalil fell in line with Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s assertion that his continued presence and actions in the country poses “adverse foreign policy consequence.”
One of Khalil’s supporters read a statement from Khalil’s wife, Noor Abdalla, after the ruling, calling it a “devastating blow to our family.”
“No person should be deemed removable from their home for speaking out against the killing of Palestinian families, doctors and journalists,” Abdalla’s statement said. “Today, in court, the government reiterated the same baseless racist claims about my husband that we have heard time and again, an attempt to smear those calling for an end to Israel’s brutal genocide in Gaza. My husband is a political prisoner who is being deprived of his rights because he believes Palestinians deserve equal dignity and freedom.”
She continued, “There is nothing the government can say about my husband that can silence this truth. This ruling is an indictment of our country’s immigration system and does not reflect truth, justice or the will of the American people.”
A view of the Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center where Mahmoud Khalil is detained, as immigration court rules in the deportation case of the Columbia University student and Palestinian activist in Jena, La., April 11, 2025.
Kathleen Flynn/Reuters
In a blistering statement posted to X, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the ruling that Kahlil can be removed from the U.S. should come as “welcome news,” writing, “It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America.” She ended the statement with “Good riddance.”
The deportation hearing played out as a federal court case in New Jersey remains active. A judge in that case has ruled that Khalil cannot be deported while the proceedings are ongoing.
“Today, we saw our worst fears play out: Mahmoud was subject to a charade of due process, a flagrant violation of his right to a fair hearing, and a weaponization of immigration law to suppress dissent. This is not over, and our fight continues,” Marc Van Der Hout, an attorney for Khalil, said in a statement Friday. “If Mahmoud can be targeted in this way, simply for speaking out for Palestinians and exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech, this can happen to anyone over any issue the Trump administration dislikes. We will continue working tirelessly until Mahmoud is free and rightfully returned home to his family and community.”
The immigration court has several limits on discovery and power to subpoena witnesses, as the judge mentioned several times on Friday.
The judge had given the government a deadline earlier this week to present evidence to back up several allegations it made against Khalil as grounds to deport him from the U.S., including that he misrepresented information on his green card application.
Despite Khalil’s team presenting evidence that went against the administration’s narrative of their client, including interviews where he had denounced antisemitism, the judge did not rule on that rebuttal or information and instead agreed that she need not go further than a two-page memo Rubio penned and submitted to the court this week.
“Today’s ruling is a rush to judgment on baseless charges that the government presented no evidence to substantiate because no evidence exists. Our client, Mr. Khalil, has been unlawfully detained in direct retaliation of his advocacy in support of Palestinian rights,” said Amol Sinha, executive director of the ACLU-NJ, which is also representing Khalil. “This finding of removability is a dangerous departure from the fundamental freedoms at the bedrock of our nation that protect free speech under the First Amendment. We will continue to advocate for Mr. Khalil’s rightful release, and we are confident he will prevail.”
While a student at Columbia University, Khalil was part of a leadership group protesting the war in Gaza. Khalil took part in negotiations with school administrators demanding the institution cut ties with Israel and divest from Israeli companies. Khalil finished his graduate studies at Columbia in December and is set to graduate in the spring.
Khalil — whose wife is about to give birth to their first child — was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at his Columbia housing in March.
The government on Thursday entered into evidence the memo signed by Rubio saying that he found Khalil’s presence in the U.S. “would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a cabinet meeting at the White House, April 10, 2025.
Nathan Howard/Reuters
Attorneys for Khalil argued in a press conference on Thursday that the government — which entered the letter and other documents into evidence Wednesday — did not present evidence that Khalil’s presence in the U.S. poses an adverse foreign policy consequence.
The government has argued, under an obscure 1952 federal law called the Immigration and Nationality Act, that it believes migrants are deportable “if the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe that the alien’s presence or activities in the United States would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.”
Attorneys for Khalil argued that determination is for a judge to make, after the government presents evidence.
The memo signed by Rubio also makes the case that another person, whose name is redacted, should be deportable under the same law.
Rubio wrote that Khalil should be deported because of his alleged role in “antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which fosters a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States.”
Van Der Hout sharply criticized the memo during a Zoom press conference on Thursday.
Rubio “talks about First Amendment activity in the United States and the effect on people in the U.S. His ‘determination’ has absolutely nothing to do with foreign policy,” Van Der Hout said.
Khalil’s attorneys said the government did not present evidence as to the alleged misrepresented information Khalil made on his green card application.
During a Zoom press conference on Friday, his legal team said they plan to file the applications for relief by the April 23 deadline. One of the forms of relief the attorneys said they are considering is filing for asylum. They anticipate there being a few more hearings in immigration court before a final decision is made, at which point there could be appeals, the legal team said.
Van Der Hout said that based on the proceedings in the immigration court, they believe the federal district court is “the only place” that Khalil is “going to get any real justice.”
“What happened in immigration court today only confirms the need for the federal court to really intervene and make a decision in this case, because the immigration court made clear today that it won’t, and believes it can’t,” Amy Belsher, NYCLU senior staff attorney, said during the press conference.
